Ground Zero Mosque: ‘Wounded Site’ | Register Exclusives | NCRegister.com

This article from the National Catholic Register described, pretty much, my own feelings and hope that an accommodation can be found that will tamp down some of the almost hysterical comments being generated. There are some folks who obviously did not read President Obama's word and choose to put the focus on him.

Calif. coach, USA Swimming sued over alleged abuse

Calif. coach, USA Swimming sued over alleged abuse

A California woman sued the governing body of U.S. competitive swimming and her former coach, claiming he sexually abused, humiliated and harassed her when she was a teenager training under his supervision.

I can't help but wonder whether the press will run with this like the Catholic priest coverage. New York Times please note.

The Efforts to Show Jesus as a Historical Person

In the National Catholic Weekly "AMERICA" (Aug 2-9, 2010) Luke Timothy Johnson authored "The Jesus Controversy" in which he takes issue with Marcus Borg and the other folks who pursue the historical Jesus. Its worth reading.

Limits of History: There is absolutely nothing wrong with studying Jesus as a historical figure, and if we so study him, it is correct to bracket the premises of faith. The sort of project undertaken by Msgr. J. P. Meier in A Marginal Jew, which tests what elements in the Gospel accounts can be historically verified, is perfectly legitimate and yields genuine results. But as Monsignor Meier himself recognizes, the empirically verifiable Jesus is by no means the "real" Jesus. It is more than legitimate, moreover, to learn as much history as possible about the first-century world of Jesus. The point of this knowledge, however, is to become better and more responsible readers of the Gospels themselves. It is not to deconstruct the Gospel narratives in order to reconstruct a "historical Jesus" and claim thereby to have discovered who Jesus really was. Still less is it to propose such a reconstruction as normative for Christians today.

History is a limited way of knowing reality. Dependent on the fragmentary bits of what was observed, recorded, saved and transmitted from the past, recognizing that all human witness is biased and cautious about speculating beyond available evidence, responsible historians know they deal only in probabilities, not certainties. Theirs is a descriptive art rather than a prescriptive science. And in the case of Jesus and the Gospels, the critical problems facing all historical reconstruction are extreme, warning investigators against pushing against the limits.